labor_efficiency
0.94
Rev/labor-hour −22% vs. cluster, staffing mismatch at 11a–1p peak
Ward ingests demand forecasts, replenishment recommendations, allocation plans from Blue Yonder, then joins them with weather, events, and demographics to produce pricing findings.
Ward reads Blue Yonder outputs via API or flat file export. Compares forecasts against actuals to measure accuracy.
Agents run against your baselines overnight. These are what they flagged without being asked.
labor_efficiency
0.94
Rev/labor-hour −22% vs. cluster, staffing mismatch at 11a–1p peak
inventory.fresh
0.89
Fresh fill 83%, backroom replenishment lag at 2–4p
promo.lift
0.81
BOGO crackers cannibalized Brand Y by 28%, net category +6%
Re-baseline Store 37 schedule against true peak, raise replen window to 1p, and review the BOGO before next cycle.
Connect external systems. Ward AI maps the schema and drafts the cleaning rules.
| Name | Type | Last sync |
|---|---|---|
sap_pos_transactions | import | 2m ago |
sap_inventory_shrinkage | import | 2m ago |
sap_labor_scheduling | import | 14m ago |
retail_inventory_weekly | import | 1h ago |
retail_google_ads_daily | import | 1h ago |
retail_meta_ads_daily | import | 1h ago |
retail_ga4_website_daily | import | 1h ago |
Move data from sources into models on a schedule. Describe the sync; Ward AI builds it.
| Name | Source | Model | Status | Schedule |
|---|---|---|---|---|
sync_sap_pos_transactions | sap_pos_transactions | pos_transactions | enabled | hourly |
sync_sap_inventory_shrinkage | sap_inventory_shrinkage | inventory_shrinkage | enabled | daily |
sync_sap_labor_scheduling | sap_labor_scheduling | labor_scheduling | enabled | daily |
sync_retail_inventory_weekly | retail_inventory_weekly | inventory_weekly | enabled | weekly |
sync_retail_google_ads_daily | retail_google_ads_daily | google_ads_daily | enabled | daily |
sync_retail_meta_ads_daily | retail_meta_ads_daily | meta_ads_daily | enabled | daily |
Ward layers on top of Blue Yonder demand planning and replenishment. Ward watches what Blue Yonder recommends and flags when actual diverges from plan.
Credentials are read-only and locked to the objects you name. Ward cannot reach a table you did not grant it, and write access is opt-in per object rather than implied by the connection.
Ward queries Blue Yonder in place and keeps no second copy. Your region, your retention policy, and no staging warehouse in the middle.
Every connector carries a schema contract. A source that changes shape fails the contract and stops the pipeline, rather than quietly writing wrong rows until someone notices the numbers moved.
Ward monitors price elasticity shifts in real time and recommends adjustments that protect margin without sacrificing volume.
Ward continuously measures price elasticity by category, tracks competitive pricing signals, and models the margin-volume tradeoff.
Definitions resolve through the semantic layer, so a number here reconciles with the dashboard your team already publishes instead of disagreeing with it quietly. How the layer works →
Dairy category showing -1.4 elasticity this week vs -0.8 baseline. Consumers responding to price changes 75% more than normal.
A 1% improvement in pricing yields an 11% profit improvement, on average. — McKinsey
Agents on your own data fail the security review, not the demo. The model is never the problem. The problem is that nobody can say what the agent is allowed to reach, what it already did, or what happens when it is wrong.
The agent sees the Blue Yonder objects you declared on the source and nothing else. Scope is enforced at query time, not in the client.
Read-only until you grant a write action explicitly, per object. A grant leaves a record naming the agent, the caller and the rows it touched.
One audit log covers every person and every agent in the tenant, so a reviewer answers one question against one system rather than correlating two.
Describe the job in plain English. Ward AI proposes the agent and the exact permissions it would need against your Blue Yonder objects, and the proposal sits there until a person approves it. Nothing runs on a draft.
Every finding it returns carries the SQL that produced it. If the query is wrong you can see that it is wrong, which is the only way a data team ever trusts one of these.
What price optimization off Blue Yonder looks like once it is live. Retail is where Ward is deployed, not what Ward is.
30,000+ SKUs · stores
A national chain drops private-label bread prices in your market. Ward detects the shift within 24 hours and models impact: nearby stores show a traffic decline among bread buyers who also carry full baskets. Ward recommends matching on the highest-velocity bread SKUs while raising prices on complementary deli items where elasticity is low, recovering traffic with a net-positive margin result.
The grocery build →3,000+ SKUs · locations
Ward segments 3,000 SKUs into price-awareness tiers: KVIs where customers compare, moderate-awareness items, and low-awareness categories like automotive and seasonal. Ward recommends holding KVI prices while implementing small increases on low-awareness items. Pilot stores show zero volume decline on adjusted items with meaningful weekly margin gains.
The convenience build →15,000+ SKUs · locations
Mid-season, Ward identifies dozens of styles selling below plan and segments them by severity: some need immediate deep markdown, others need moderate discounts, and a group should hold price because they're trending toward natural clearance. This tiered approach recovers significant margin versus the standard blanket-markdown playbook.
The fashion build →Your platform team owns the connection, the definitions and the policy. These are the teams that consume what comes out of it.
Merchandising
Elasticity shifts caught in real time. Margin protected without volume loss.
What they see →Finance
Where price is leaving money on the table, and where moves would burn volume.
What they see →E-Commerce
Competitive price tracking with elasticity measured per channel.
What they see →| Measure | Effect | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Forecast Accuracy | Plan vs actual tracked | Forecasts scored against actuals with external signal overlay. |
| Replenishment Exceptions | Revenue-ranked triage | Exceptions auto-prioritized so high-impact ones work first. |
| Fill Rate | Allocation drift caught | Plan-to-demand divergence flagged before stockouts form. |
| Plan vs Actual Variance | Feedback loop tightened | Continuous plan-to-outcome comparison for planning teams. |
Ward reads Blue Yonder outputs via API or flat file export. Compares forecasts against actuals to measure accuracy.
Ward reads Demand forecasts, Replenishment recommendations, Allocation plans and Exception alerts. Credentials are read-only and scoped to the objects you name, so Ward cannot reach a table you did not grant it.
No. Ward queries Blue Yonder in place and holds no second copy of your data. Nothing is exported to run Price Optimization, and your residency and retention policy are unchanged by connecting Ward.
Every connector carries a schema contract. When a source changes shape the contract fails loudly and the pipeline stops, rather than writing wrong rows into your warehouse for a week before anyone notices the numbers moved.
Ward monitors price elasticity shifts in real time and recommends adjustments that protect margin without sacrificing volume. Ward continuously measures price elasticity by category, tracks competitive pricing signals, and models the margin-volume tradeoff.
Yes. Every figure Ward reports carries the query that produced it, resolved through the semantic layer, so it reconciles with the dashboard your team already publishes rather than disagreeing with it quietly.
Only what you declared. An agent is scoped to named tables and cannot reach past them, it is read-only unless you grant a write action explicitly, and every query, tool call and result is logged against the agent identity that made it.
Typically VP / Director of Merchandising, CFO / VP Finance and Head of E-Commerce / Digital. They read the output; your platform team owns the connection, the definitions and the policy that produced it.
A national chain drops private-label bread prices in your market. Ward detects the shift within 24 hours and models impact: nearby stores show a traffic decline among bread buyers who also carry full baskets. Ward recommends matching on the highest-velocity bread SKUs while raising prices on complementary deli items where elasticity is low, recovering traffic with a net-positive margin result.
Deploying is free. You pay 5% of the model compute it uses, and nothing else. No call required to find out whether this works on your data.
Read-only to start · your LLM keys · SOC 2 Type II underway · or book a call directly
Tell us about your operation. We’ll show you the problems Ward catches, and the ones your current tools miss.