The business wants AI. You sign off on the architecture.
Business teams want the AI. You vet the implementation. Ward starts read-only, runs on policy, and hands you every artifact you need before signature: architecture, contracts, and references, all on the table.
What lands on your desk
when the business buys AI.
The business wants AI. You sign off on the architecture.
Business sponsor already chose the vendor. You inherit the security review
Every AI vendor wants write access and a copy of the production data
Model lock-in means rewriting the stack when GPT or Claude moves again
Audit trail is an afterthought. Compliance has nothing to pull on
Data lake project keeps getting bumped for the next thing the business wants
Source: Gartner
How Ward earns
the sign-off.
- ×Business sponsor already chose the vendor. You inherit the security review
- ×Every AI vendor wants write access and a copy of the production data
- ×Model lock-in means rewriting the stack when GPT or Claude moves again
- ×Audit trail is an afterthought. Compliance has nothing to pull on
- ✓Federated query: data stays in your warehouse. No copies, no shadow lake
- ✓Read-only credentials. Cedar policies enforce least-privilege per agent
- ✓LLM-agnostic. Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini, Ollama. Bring your own keys
- ✓Every query, every model, every source logged. SIEM-ready audit output
Federated query: data stays in your warehouse. No copies, no shadow lake
Read-only credentials. Cedar policies enforce least-privilege per agent
LLM-agnostic. Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini, Ollama. Bring your own keys
Every query, every model, every source logged. SIEM-ready audit output
VPC peering, PrivateLink, SOC 2 II. Your security review is short
From signature
to running insights.
A live pilot for head of it hits these milestones on real data, on a fixed-fee schedule.
What runs where. Who can touch what.
Federated query. Read-only credentials. Cedar policies enforce least-privilege. Full audit trail per query. No data leaves your warehouse. The business gets the insights. You keep production safe.
Ward queries Snowflake, BigQuery, Redshift, Postgres, and SAP HANA in place. No ETL into a Ward-owned database. No copy. Data residency unchanged.
Service accounts are locked to SELECT. Cedar policies enforce per-agent, per-resource scope. Agents cannot mutate the data they reason over.
Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini, Ollama. Bring your own keys, route per task. Switch models without rewriting the stack. No vendor lock-in at the model layer.
Every query, every source, every model call, every reasoning step logged. SIEM-ready output. Compliance has a thread to pull on for any insight.
VPC peering, PrivateLink, IP allowlist. Single-tenant deploy in your AWS, Azure, or GCP if your security posture requires it.
SAML/OIDC SSO. SCIM provisioning. Role-based access tied to your IdP groups. No shadow user store. Offboarding flows through your existing process.
The product your
business teams will use.
Chat
Ask anything. Ward routes to the right agent and returns cited answers.
I pulled Store 37’s last 28 days against the chain baseline. Two root causes, both compounding.
| Signal | Finding |
|---|---|
labor_efficiency | Rev/labor-hour −22% vs. cluster, staffing mismatch at 11a–1p peak |
inventory.fresh | Fresh fill 83%, backroom replenishment lag at 2–4p |
promo.lift | BOGO crackers cannibalized Brand Y by 28%, net category +6% |
Recommend: re-baseline Store 37 schedule against true peak, raise replen window to 1p, and review the BOGO before next cycle.
labor_scheduling…
Dashboards
Pinned views built from saved data-lake queries.
Models
Browse, search, and manage data–lake model definitions for your tenant.
| Name | Namespace | Version |
|---|---|---|
retail_pos_transactions | retail | 1.0 |
retail_inventory_snapshot | retail | 1.2 |
retail_labor_scheduling | retail | 1.0 |
retail_promo_calendar | retail | 1.1 |
retail_supplier_performance | retail | 1.0 |
sap_inventory_shrinkage | sap | 1.0 |
ga4_daily_events | marketing | 1.0 |
meta_ads_ad_level | marketing | 1.0 |
Sources
Connect external systems to the data lake.
| Name | Type | Last sync |
|---|---|---|
sap_pos_transactions | import | 2m ago |
sap_inventory_shrinkage | import | 2m ago |
sap_labor_scheduling | import | 14m ago |
retail_inventory_weekly | import | 1h ago |
retail_google_ads_daily | import | 1h ago |
retail_meta_ads_daily | import | 1h ago |
retail_ga4_website_daily | import | 1h ago |
Architecture
Two ways to connect. Federate against your live systems, or ingest into Ward’s data lake. Toggle below.
sap.possnow.inventoryPipelines
Move data from sources into models on a schedule.
| Name | Source | Model | Status | Schedule |
|---|---|---|---|---|
sync_sap_pos_transactions | sap_pos_transactions | pos_transactions | enabled | hourly |
sync_sap_labor_scheduling | sap_labor_scheduling | labor_scheduling | enabled | daily |
sync_sap_inventory_shrinkage | sap_inventory_shrinkage | inventory_shrinkage | enabled | daily |
sync_retail_inventory_weekly | retail_inventory_weekly | inventory_weekly | enabled | weekly |
sync_retail_google_ads_daily | retail_google_ads_daily | google_ads_daily | enabled | daily |
sync_retail_ga4_website_daily | retail_ga4_website_daily | ga4_website_daily | enabled | daily |
Streams
Real-time ingestion pipelines.
pos.txnstore_037, basket $42.18inv.movedc_west → store_104labor.clockstore_022 shift_startpos.txnstore_211, basket $19.04
Policies
Browse and manage Cedar access policies for your tenant.
| Policy ID | Effect | Resources |
|---|---|---|
merch-read-default | permit | Model::* |
finance-read-shrinkage | permit | Model::"shrinkage" |
vendor-blocked | forbid | Model::"labor_*" |
region-west-only | permit | Tenant::"acme" |
Entities
Principals and resources referenced by Cedar policies.
| Entity UID | Type | Tenant |
|---|---|---|
Tenant::"acme" | Tenant | acme |
Model::"sap.pos_transactions" | Model | acme |
Model::"sap.inventory_shrinkage" | Model | acme |
Model::"sap.labor_scheduling" | Model | acme |
Model::"retail.toast_pos_daily" | Model | acme |
Model::"retail.ga4_website_daily" | Model | acme |
Providers
Manage LLM API keys and the model profiles that use them.
| Name | Provider | Used by | Created |
|---|---|---|---|
anthropic-default | Anthropic | 3 profiles | Apr 22 |
openai-default | OpenAI | 2 profiles | Apr 22 |
gemini-default | Gemini | 1 profile | Apr 22 |
ollama-onprem | Ollama | 2 profiles | Apr 22 |
LLM-agnostic. Bring your own key, route per task. No lock-in.
Settings
Manage your dashboard preferences and account.
Light and dark themes are available. Your choice is remembered per browser.
Architecture packet: data flow diagram, Cedar policy bundle, SOC 2 II report, sub-processor list, network topology. Read-only by default. SIEM-ready logs. Available before the pilot starts.
Verticals the business teams
will use Ward for.
What head of it
uses Ward for first.
The three insight types this role drives the most value from. Each one tailored for technology decision-making.
What the business
teams receive.
The insight types Ward generates for the business teams you’re approving the platform for. Every one inspectable, every one logged.
The platform pieces
this role leans on.
Systems Ward connects to,
read-only by default.
Operator stories
and the alternatives.
Two ways to start.
Run a read-only proof on your stack, or have advisory walk you through architecture.
Playbooks for Technology.
The procedures this team runs on Ward. Each pairs a data insight with the AI automation and automated data routing to act on it.
Insights surface
Ward’s agents detect what changed, why it matters, and what to do about it. Every insight includes a recommended action. Not just a chart to interpret.
Insights become actions
Any insight card can be turned into a tracked ticket or task. Dispatched to the right person, on the right channel: mobile push, text, or email. Not every insight needs a ticket. When one does, it has an owner.
Your team responds
Insights get voted up or down with reasoning. Tickets get completed or rejected. Every response is a signal. Ward learns what worked, what missed, and why.
Outcomes measured
Ward evaluates real results: revenue, margin, fill rate, labor cost. Did the action actually improve the number it targeted? Measured outcomes, not assumptions.
Agents get sharper
Every vote, every completed ticket, every measured outcome feeds back in. Ward learns from your team’s judgment and real-world results. Each cycle sharpens the next. Then it starts again.
Control AI spend by department and user.
Without skimping on the outcome.
Give every department and every user a compute budget. Ward routes each question to the cheapest model that clears the quality bar, so finance caps the spend without capping what the business gets back.
The business wants AI. You sign off on the architecture.
Architecture review, MSA, DPA, SOC 2 II report, on the table before you sign.
Find out what your data has been hiding.
Tell us about your operation. We’ll show you the problems Ward catches, and the ones your current tools miss.