Ward monitors fill rate so your Fashion team doesn't have to.
location-level fill rate signals, caught before they compound.
Why fill rate matters
in fashion retail.
Fashion fill rate must be measured at the style-size-color level. A store can hold 200 units of a dress and zero in the most popular size, technically "in stock," functionally a stockout. Ward surfaces broken assortments where key sizes are missing from otherwise healthy inventory positions.
Industry benchmarks
Healthy fashion size-level availability runs 85-92% on top styles by week 6 and 70-80% by week 10. Operators with active size rebalancing typically maintain 5-10 percentage points higher size-level availability and recover 2-4 points of full-price sell-through.
Broken size run detection, peak season
Ward reveals that a significant share of top styles have broken size runs across the chain, popular sizes depleted while other sizes sit. Ward recommends urgent inter-store transfers for the highest-revenue styles and a size curve recalibration for the next allocation cycle. Operations executes within 48 hours to protect at-risk revenue.
What Ward actually tracks
Ward tracks style-size-color availability, broken assortment rates, size-level sell-through velocity, and transfer opportunity value. It distinguishes supply-driven stockouts from allocation-driven gaps where inventory exists but sits in the wrong stores.
Data signals
Inventory at style-size-color-store, POS velocity at the same grain, store cluster definitions, freight cost matrix, and end-of-season selling-window context.
Three pitfalls Ward catches
in fashion fill rate.
- 01 Fill rate measured at the style level masks size brokenness, which is what the customer actually experiences in the fitting room.
- 02 OMS shows "in stock" when size XL is the only thing left; conversion craters but the dashboard reports availability.
- 03 Inter-store transfer thresholds are set on freight cost rather than at-risk full-price revenue; the math usually justifies more transfers than ops authorizes.
How Ward runs fill rate
for fashion retailers.
-
01
Measure availability at SKU level, not style
Ward computes size-level on-hand and projects depletion using current velocity per store, exposing broken runs by mid-season.
-
02
Calculate transfer ROI per gap
Each broken-size gap is paired with a candidate donor store; the freight-vs-revenue trade is computed so transfers run only where they pay.
-
03
Feed back into next-season size curves
Recurring size demand signals (XL under-allocated in cluster B, size 2 over-allocated in cluster A) become inputs to the next pre-season.
What a Ward card looks like.
Estate fill rate at 94.2%, up 1.2pp vs last week. Stores 22 and 37 dropped below 85% threshold. Fresh produce is the driver.
Chat
Ask anything. Ward routes to the right agent and returns cited answers.
I pulled Store 37’s last 28 days against the chain baseline. Two root causes, both compounding.
| Signal | Finding |
|---|---|
labor_efficiency | Rev/labor-hour −22% vs. cluster, staffing mismatch at 11a–1p peak |
inventory.fresh | Fresh fill 83%, backroom replenishment lag at 2–4p |
promo.lift | BOGO crackers cannibalized Brand Y by 28%, net category +6% |
Recommend: re-baseline Store 37 schedule against true peak, raise replen window to 1p, and review the BOGO before next cycle.
labor_scheduling…
Dashboards
Pinned views built from saved data-lake queries.
Models
Browse, search, and manage data–lake model definitions for your tenant.
| Name | Namespace | Version |
|---|---|---|
retail_pos_transactions | retail | 1.0 |
retail_inventory_snapshot | retail | 1.2 |
retail_labor_scheduling | retail | 1.0 |
retail_promo_calendar | retail | 1.1 |
retail_supplier_performance | retail | 1.0 |
sap_inventory_shrinkage | sap | 1.0 |
ga4_daily_events | marketing | 1.0 |
meta_ads_ad_level | marketing | 1.0 |
Sources
Connect external systems to the data lake.
| Name | Type | Last sync |
|---|---|---|
sap_pos_transactions | import | 2m ago |
sap_inventory_shrinkage | import | 2m ago |
sap_labor_scheduling | import | 14m ago |
retail_inventory_weekly | import | 1h ago |
retail_google_ads_daily | import | 1h ago |
retail_meta_ads_daily | import | 1h ago |
retail_ga4_website_daily | import | 1h ago |
Architecture
Two ways to connect. Federate against your live systems, or ingest into Ward’s data lake. Toggle below.
sap.possnow.inventoryPipelines
Move data from sources into models on a schedule.
| Name | Source | Model | Status | Schedule |
|---|---|---|---|---|
sync_sap_pos_transactions | sap_pos_transactions | pos_transactions | enabled | hourly |
sync_sap_labor_scheduling | sap_labor_scheduling | labor_scheduling | enabled | daily |
sync_sap_inventory_shrinkage | sap_inventory_shrinkage | inventory_shrinkage | enabled | daily |
sync_retail_inventory_weekly | retail_inventory_weekly | inventory_weekly | enabled | weekly |
sync_retail_google_ads_daily | retail_google_ads_daily | google_ads_daily | enabled | daily |
sync_retail_ga4_website_daily | retail_ga4_website_daily | ga4_website_daily | enabled | daily |
Streams
Real-time ingestion pipelines.
pos.txnstore_037, basket $42.18inv.movedc_west → store_104labor.clockstore_022 shift_startpos.txnstore_211, basket $19.04
Policies
Browse and manage Cedar access policies for your tenant.
| Policy ID | Effect | Resources |
|---|---|---|
merch-read-default | permit | Model::* |
finance-read-shrinkage | permit | Model::"shrinkage" |
vendor-blocked | forbid | Model::"labor_*" |
region-west-only | permit | Tenant::"acme" |
Entities
Principals and resources referenced by Cedar policies.
| Entity UID | Type | Tenant |
|---|---|---|
Tenant::"acme" | Tenant | acme |
Model::"sap.pos_transactions" | Model | acme |
Model::"sap.inventory_shrinkage" | Model | acme |
Model::"sap.labor_scheduling" | Model | acme |
Model::"retail.toast_pos_daily" | Model | acme |
Model::"retail.ga4_website_daily" | Model | acme |
Providers
Manage LLM API keys and the model profiles that use them.
| Name | Provider | Used by | Created |
|---|---|---|---|
anthropic-default | Anthropic | 3 profiles | Apr 22 |
openai-default | OpenAI | 2 profiles | Apr 22 |
gemini-default | Gemini | 1 profile | Apr 22 |
ollama-onprem | Ollama | 2 profiles | Apr 22 |
LLM-agnostic. Bring your own key, route per task. No lock-in.
Settings
Manage your dashboard preferences and account.
Light and dark themes are available. Your choice is remembered per browser.
Fashion fill rate:
the shift.
- ×Markdown timing
- ×Size curve misallocation
- ×Style velocity prediction
- ✓Estate-wide fill rate dashboard
- ✓Threshold-based alerting
- ✓Store-vs-estate benchmarking
Questions about fashion fill rate.
Fashion fill rate must be measured at the style-size-color level. A store can hold 200 units of a dress and zero in the most popular size, technically "in stock," functionally a stockout. Ward surfaces broken assortments where key sizes are missing from otherwise healthy inventory positions.
Ward reveals that a significant share of top styles have broken size runs across the chain, popular sizes depleted while other sizes sit. Ward recommends urgent inter-store transfers for the highest-revenue styles and a size curve recalibration for the next allocation cycle. Operations executes within 48 hours to protect at-risk revenue.
Ward tracks style-size-color availability, broken assortment rates, size-level sell-through velocity, and transfer opportunity value. It distinguishes supply-driven stockouts from allocation-driven gaps where inventory exists but sits in the wrong stores.
First fill rate insight cards arrive within 48 hours. Robust fashion baselines form within two weeks. Ward requires at least 2 full selling cycles to baseline style velocity and markdown timing. Results vary between basics and trend-driven categories.
Fashion fill rate
by data source.
More Fashion insight cards.
Fashion retailers: see what fill rate problems Ward catches.
Root causes, not just alerts. See it on your data.
Find out what your data has been hiding.
Tell us about your operation. We’ll show you the problems Ward catches, and the ones your current tools miss.