Real-time assortment for Fashion & Apparel.
Assortment Planning at scale. Ward handles it across every location.
Why assortment matters
in fashion retail.
Ward doesn't replace the buyer's eye, it sharpens the math behind the buy. Which store clusters need wider assortment with shallow depth? Which need narrow-deep buys with full size runs? Ward analyzes sell-through by cluster, customer segment, and style attribute to recommend architecture that matches how customers actually shop each location.
Industry benchmarks
Fashion option counts vary 2-4x across store clusters in a healthy assortment plan. Cluster-aware planning typically lifts full-price sell-through 2-5 points and reduces end-of-season markdown depth by 100-300 bps.
Assortment architecture, denim category
A denim buyer has 200 styles to allocate across 90 stores. Ward reveals that urban flagships convert best with wide assortment at shallow depth, while suburban stores need fewer core styles with full size runs. The current uniform allocation starves variety in urban stores and creates size gaps in suburban ones. A cluster-specific matrix reduces markdown risk while lifting full-price sell-through.
What Ward actually tracks
Ward tracks assortment width vs depth by cluster, style attribute performance, size curve accuracy, and inter-style cannibalization. It measures revenue-per-option to identify when adding more styles dilutes overall performance.
Data signals
POS at style-store-day, customer segment data, style attributes, cannibalization signals from basket analysis, and online-to-store demand transfer patterns.
Three pitfalls Ward catches
in fashion assortment.
- 01 Top-down option counts get applied uniformly across stores; smaller-volume locations carry too many options and starve depth where it matters.
- 02 Cannibalization between similar styles (two black bodycon dresses) is ignored, so the second option doesn't add what its standalone sell-through suggests.
- 03 Cluster definitions don't account for online inventory pooling; a store next to a strong DC has different effective assortment math than a remote one.
How Ward runs assortment
for fashion retailers.
-
01
Cluster stores by shopper signal, not store size
Ward uses basket affinity, brand-tier mix, and category penetration to produce 4-8 actionable clusters, regardless of square footage or banner.
-
02
Score every option per cluster
Productivity, incremental contribution, cannibalization, and size-curve fit are computed per cluster, exposing which styles deserve depth, breadth, or removal.
-
03
Architect the seasonal plan
Ward outputs cluster-specific option counts, depth, and size curves; the buying team uses these as inputs to the open-to-buy.
What a Ward card looks like.
Cluster B stores (urban, high-traffic) underperforming on premium snacks vs Cluster A by 34%. Assortment gap: 12 SKUs missing.
Chat
Ask anything. Ward routes to the right agent and returns cited answers.
I pulled Store 37’s last 28 days against the chain baseline. Two root causes, both compounding.
| Signal | Finding |
|---|---|
labor_efficiency | Rev/labor-hour −22% vs. cluster, staffing mismatch at 11a–1p peak |
inventory.fresh | Fresh fill 83%, backroom replenishment lag at 2–4p |
promo.lift | BOGO crackers cannibalized Brand Y by 28%, net category +6% |
Recommend: re-baseline Store 37 schedule against true peak, raise replen window to 1p, and review the BOGO before next cycle.
labor_scheduling…
Dashboards
Pinned views built from saved data-lake queries.
Models
Browse, search, and manage data–lake model definitions for your tenant.
| Name | Namespace | Version |
|---|---|---|
retail_pos_transactions | retail | 1.0 |
retail_inventory_snapshot | retail | 1.2 |
retail_labor_scheduling | retail | 1.0 |
retail_promo_calendar | retail | 1.1 |
retail_supplier_performance | retail | 1.0 |
sap_inventory_shrinkage | sap | 1.0 |
ga4_daily_events | marketing | 1.0 |
meta_ads_ad_level | marketing | 1.0 |
Sources
Connect external systems to the data lake.
| Name | Type | Last sync |
|---|---|---|
sap_pos_transactions | import | 2m ago |
sap_inventory_shrinkage | import | 2m ago |
sap_labor_scheduling | import | 14m ago |
retail_inventory_weekly | import | 1h ago |
retail_google_ads_daily | import | 1h ago |
retail_meta_ads_daily | import | 1h ago |
retail_ga4_website_daily | import | 1h ago |
Architecture
Two ways to connect. Federate against your live systems, or ingest into Ward’s data lake. Toggle below.
sap.possnow.inventoryPipelines
Move data from sources into models on a schedule.
| Name | Source | Model | Status | Schedule |
|---|---|---|---|---|
sync_sap_pos_transactions | sap_pos_transactions | pos_transactions | enabled | hourly |
sync_sap_labor_scheduling | sap_labor_scheduling | labor_scheduling | enabled | daily |
sync_sap_inventory_shrinkage | sap_inventory_shrinkage | inventory_shrinkage | enabled | daily |
sync_retail_inventory_weekly | retail_inventory_weekly | inventory_weekly | enabled | weekly |
sync_retail_google_ads_daily | retail_google_ads_daily | google_ads_daily | enabled | daily |
sync_retail_ga4_website_daily | retail_ga4_website_daily | ga4_website_daily | enabled | daily |
Streams
Real-time ingestion pipelines.
pos.txnstore_037, basket $42.18inv.movedc_west → store_104labor.clockstore_022 shift_startpos.txnstore_211, basket $19.04
Policies
Browse and manage Cedar access policies for your tenant.
| Policy ID | Effect | Resources |
|---|---|---|
merch-read-default | permit | Model::* |
finance-read-shrinkage | permit | Model::"shrinkage" |
vendor-blocked | forbid | Model::"labor_*" |
region-west-only | permit | Tenant::"acme" |
Entities
Principals and resources referenced by Cedar policies.
| Entity UID | Type | Tenant |
|---|---|---|
Tenant::"acme" | Tenant | acme |
Model::"sap.pos_transactions" | Model | acme |
Model::"sap.inventory_shrinkage" | Model | acme |
Model::"sap.labor_scheduling" | Model | acme |
Model::"retail.toast_pos_daily" | Model | acme |
Model::"retail.ga4_website_daily" | Model | acme |
Providers
Manage LLM API keys and the model profiles that use them.
| Name | Provider | Used by | Created |
|---|---|---|---|
anthropic-default | Anthropic | 3 profiles | Apr 22 |
openai-default | OpenAI | 2 profiles | Apr 22 |
gemini-default | Gemini | 1 profile | Apr 22 |
ollama-onprem | Ollama | 2 profiles | Apr 22 |
LLM-agnostic. Bring your own key, route per task. No lock-in.
Settings
Manage your dashboard preferences and account.
Light and dark themes are available. Your choice is remembered per browser.
Fashion assortment:
the shift.
- ×Markdown timing
- ×Size curve misallocation
- ×Style velocity prediction
- ✓Store cluster segmentation
- ✓SKU rationalization recommendations
- ✓Whitespace opportunity detection
Fashion KPI impact.
Ward requires at least 2 full selling cycles to baseline style velocity and markdown timing. Results vary between basics and trend-driven categories.
Questions about fashion assortment.
Ward doesn't replace the buyer's eye, it sharpens the math behind the buy. Which store clusters need wider assortment with shallow depth? Which need narrow-deep buys with full size runs? Ward analyzes sell-through by cluster, customer segment, and style attribute to recommend architecture that matches how customers actually shop each location.
A denim buyer has 200 styles to allocate across 90 stores. Ward reveals that urban flagships convert best with wide assortment at shallow depth, while suburban stores need fewer core styles with full size runs. The current uniform allocation starves variety in urban stores and creates size gaps in suburban ones. A cluster-specific matrix reduces markdown risk while lifting full-price sell-through.
Ward tracks assortment width vs depth by cluster, style attribute performance, size curve accuracy, and inter-style cannibalization. It measures revenue-per-option to identify when adding more styles dilutes overall performance.
First assortment insight cards arrive within 48 hours. Robust fashion baselines form within two weeks. Ward requires at least 2 full selling cycles to baseline style velocity and markdown timing. Results vary between basics and trend-driven categories.
Fashion assortment
by data source.
More Fashion insight cards.
Fashion retailers: see what assortment problems Ward catches.
Root causes, not just alerts. See it on your data.
Find out what your data has been hiding.
Tell us about your operation. We’ll show you the problems Ward catches, and the ones your current tools miss.