Shrinkage Detection + Convenience Retail: Built for Head of IT
Convenience operators find Shrinkage problems in post-mortems and quarterly reviews. Ward catches them daily, with root causes and recommended actions. Your Technology team has the data. What they don't have is bandwidth to find what's buried in it.
What is Shrinkage Detection for Convenience & C-Store?
Shrinkage Detection is the process of ward identifies abnormal inventory loss patterns and distinguishes between theft, damage, spoilage, and administrative error.
For Convenience & C-Store retailers specifically, this means monitoring 3,000+ SKUs across locations. High-frequency, low-SKU environments where every facing counts. Ward monitors impulse categories and daypart demand patterns around the clock.
How Ward delivers Shrinkage insight cards: Ward compares expected inventory against actual counts, segments loss by cause category, and flags store-level anomalies against your estate baseline.
Key capabilities
- Cause-level shrinkage attribution
- Store-vs-estate benchmarking
- Receiving dock anomaly detection
- Pattern recognition across time
Chat
Ask anything. Ward routes to the right agent and returns cited answers.
I pulled Store 37’s last 28 days against the chain baseline. Two root causes — both compounding.
| Signal | Finding |
|---|---|
labor_efficiency | Rev/labor-hour −22% vs. cluster — staffing mismatch at 11a–1p peak |
inventory.fresh | Fresh fill 83% — backroom replenishment lag at 2–4p |
promo.lift | BOGO crackers cannibalized Brand Y by 28% — net category +6% |
Recommend: re-baseline Store 37 schedule against true peak, raise replen window to 1p, and review the BOGO before next cycle.
labor_scheduling…
Dashboards
Pinned views built from saved data-lake queries.
Models
Browse, search, and manage data–lake model definitions for your tenant.
| Name | Namespace | Version |
|---|---|---|
retail_pos_transactions | retail | 1.0 |
retail_inventory_snapshot | retail | 1.2 |
retail_labor_scheduling | retail | 1.0 |
retail_promo_calendar | retail | 1.1 |
retail_supplier_performance | retail | 1.0 |
sap_inventory_shrinkage | sap | 1.0 |
ga4_daily_events | marketing | 1.0 |
meta_ads_ad_level | marketing | 1.0 |
Sources
Connect external systems to the data lake.
| Name | Type | Last sync |
|---|---|---|
sap_pos_transactions | import | 2m ago |
sap_inventory_shrinkage | import | 2m ago |
sap_labor_scheduling | import | 14m ago |
retail_inventory_weekly | import | 1h ago |
retail_google_ads_daily | import | 1h ago |
retail_meta_ads_daily | import | 1h ago |
retail_ga4_website_daily | import | 1h ago |
Architecture
Two ways to connect. Federate against your live systems, or ingest into Ward’s data lake. Toggle below.
sap.possnow.inventoryPipelines
Move data from sources into models on a schedule.
| Name | Source | Model | Status | Schedule |
|---|---|---|---|---|
sync_sap_pos_transactions | sap_pos_transactions | pos_transactions | enabled | hourly |
sync_sap_labor_scheduling | sap_labor_scheduling | labor_scheduling | enabled | daily |
sync_sap_inventory_shrinkage | sap_inventory_shrinkage | inventory_shrinkage | enabled | daily |
sync_retail_inventory_weekly | retail_inventory_weekly | inventory_weekly | enabled | weekly |
sync_retail_google_ads_daily | retail_google_ads_daily | google_ads_daily | enabled | daily |
sync_retail_ga4_website_daily | retail_ga4_website_daily | ga4_website_daily | enabled | daily |
Streams
Real-time ingestion pipelines.
pos.txnstore_037 — basket $42.18inv.movedc_west → store_104labor.clockstore_022 shift_startpos.txnstore_211 — basket $19.04
Policies
Browse and manage Cedar access policies for your tenant.
| Policy ID | Effect | Resources |
|---|---|---|
merch-read-default | permit | Model::* |
finance-read-shrinkage | permit | Model::"shrinkage" |
vendor-blocked | forbid | Model::"labor_*" |
region-west-only | permit | Tenant::"acme" |
Entities
Principals and resources referenced by Cedar policies.
| Entity UID | Type | Tenant |
|---|---|---|
Tenant::"acme" | Tenant | acme |
Model::"sap.pos_transactions" | Model | acme |
Model::"sap.inventory_shrinkage" | Model | acme |
Model::"sap.labor_scheduling" | Model | acme |
Model::"retail.toast_pos_daily" | Model | acme |
Model::"retail.ga4_website_daily" | Model | acme |
Providers
Manage LLM API keys and the model profiles that use them.
| Name | Provider | Used by | Created |
|---|---|---|---|
anthropic-default | Anthropic | 3 profiles | Apr 22 |
openai-default | OpenAI | 2 profiles | Apr 22 |
gemini-default | Gemini | 1 profile | Apr 22 |
ollama-onprem | Ollama | 2 profiles | Apr 22 |
LLM-agnostic. Bring your own key, route per task. No lock-in.
Settings
Manage your dashboard preferences and account.
Light and dark themes are available. Your choice is remembered per browser.
Why Shrinkage matters for Convenience retail
C-store shrinkage is dominated by slow-bleed employee theft and scan avoidance — small per-transaction losses that compound across thousands of daily transactions. Ward monitors voids, no-sales, and scan-rate deviations, then correlates them with shift patterns and employee schedules to surface risk that audit cycles miss.
The business wants AI. You sign off on the architecture.
- ×Business sponsor already chose the vendor. You inherit the security review
- ×Every AI vendor wants write access and a copy of the production data
- ×Model lock-in means rewriting the stack when GPT or Claude moves again
- ×Audit trail is an afterthought. Compliance has nothing to pull on
- ×Data lake project keeps getting bumped for the next thing the business wants
- ✓Federated query: data stays in your warehouse. No copies, no shadow lake
- ✓Read-only credentials. Cedar policies enforce least-privilege per agent
- ✓LLM-agnostic. Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini, Ollama. Bring your own keys
- ✓Every query, every model, every source logged. SIEM-ready audit output
- ✓VPC peering, PrivateLink, SOC 2 II. Your security review is short
74% of enterprise AI projects stall before production. Integration debt and security review are the top two reasons. Source: Gartner
Shift pattern anomaly, regional c-store operator
Ward flags multiple locations with a consistent pattern: tobacco void rates spike during a specific overnight shift window. The amounts are small enough to evade threshold-based alerts but consistent enough to represent significant annual loss per store. Ward attributes the pattern to specific shift schedules, and investigation confirms scan avoidance by a ring of night-shift employees across the affected stores.
What a Ward insight card looks like
Store #37 showing 4.2% shrinkage vs 1.8% estate average. Pattern suggests receiving dock discrepancy, not shoplifting.
Convenience KPI impact
Frequently asked questions
Ward identifies abnormal inventory loss patterns and distinguishes between theft, damage, spoilage, and administrative error. For Convenience retail specifically, Ward monitors 3,000+ SKUs across your locations and delivers automated insight cards with root cause analysis and recommended actions.
Ward tracks Transactions/hour, Attach rate, Basket size, Planogram compliance, Daypart mix at the store-category level. Ward compares expected inventory against actual counts, segments loss by cause category, and flags store-level anomalies against your estate baseline.
The business wants AI. You sign off on the architecture. Ward solves this with automated insight cards: Federated query: data stays in your warehouse. No copies, no shadow lake. Read-only credentials. Cedar policies enforce least-privilege per agent. LLM-agnostic. Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini, Ollama. Bring your own keys.
Ward delivers daily insight cards covering Transactions/hour, Attach rate, Basket size — tailored for Technology decision-making. Each card includes what changed, why it matters, and what to do next.
Ward focuses on transaction anomaly rates (voids, no-sales, manual overrides), shift-correlated patterns, high-theft category velocity gaps, and receiving accuracy on high-value items — benchmarking each store against its own history and the estate average.
Ward flags multiple locations with a consistent pattern: tobacco void rates spike during a specific overnight shift window. The amounts are small enough to evade threshold-based alerts but consistent enough to represent significant annual loss per store. Ward attributes the pattern to specific shift schedules, and investigation confirms scan avoidance by a ring of night-shift employees across the affected stores.
First insight cards arrive within 48 hours of data connection. Ward needs approximately 2 weeks to establish robust baselines for your specific operation.
No. Ward sits on top of your existing stack. It is the proactive intelligence layer that watches your data continuously and delivers insight cards — so your team acts on findings instead of hunting for them.
Related solutions
Insights surface
Ward’s agents detect what changed, why it matters, and what to do about it. Every insight includes a recommended action. Not just a chart to interpret.
Insights become actions
Any insight card can be turned into a tracked ticket or task. Dispatched to the right person, on the right channel: mobile push, text, or email. Not every insight needs a ticket. When one does, it has an owner.
Your team responds
Insights get voted up or down with reasoning. Tickets get completed or rejected. Every response is a signal. Ward learns what worked, what missed, and why.
Outcomes measured
Ward evaluates real results: revenue, margin, fill rate, labor cost. Did the action actually improve the number it targeted? Measured outcomes, not assumptions.
Agents get sharper
Every vote, every completed ticket, every measured outcome feeds back in. Ward learns from your team’s judgment and real-world results. Each cycle sharpens the next. Then it starts again.
See what Convenience shrinkage problems Ward catches.
Root causes, not just alerts. See it on your data.
Find out what your data has been hiding.
Tell us about your operation. We’ll show you the problems Ward catches — and the ones your current tools miss.